The Convention People's Party (CPP) has criticized the government's "One Village, One Dam" initiative, labeling it as ineffective. Opare Addo, a key member of the CPP, suggests that the government should have opted for a "One District, One Pond" policy instead, focusing on aquaculture ¹.
According to Addo, this approach would have resulted in over 260 fish ponds across Ghana, providing each district with a reliable and affordable source of fish. He argues that cultivating fish in ponds on land is more economical and efficient than marine fishing, eliminating high fuel costs and allowing for quicker harvesting within four to five hours.
Addo questions the effectiveness of the dams promised by the government, citing that many have dried up and failed to serve their intended purpose. He emphasizes that fish ponds would have been a better investment, providing a sustainable source of protein for Ghanaians.
"The government's initiative was a mistake," Addo says. "We would have been counting over 260 fish ponds in this country, and every district in Ghana would have had fish, which is far cheaper than what comes from the coast."
The CPP proposes a bold new direction for Ghana's fisheries sector. If elected, they vow to seize foreign vessels fishing in Ghanaian waters, protecting the country's marine resources.
Key Takeaways
- One Village, One Dam initiative criticized by CPP as ineffective
- One District, One Pond policy proposed as alternative
- Aquaculture deemed more economical and efficient than marine fishing
- CPP promises to seize foreign vessels fishing in Ghanaian waters
As Ghana continues to navigate its economic and environmental challenges, innovative solutions like the "One District, One Pond" policy may hold the key to unlocking sustainable growth and food security. Will the government reconsider its approach, or will the CPP's proposal fall on deaf ears? Only time will tell.